<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gibson Announces Guitar Of The Week #19 :: Les Paul Classic Antique Zebra Wood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/</link>
	<description>News, Reviews, And Commentary On The Latest Guitars &#38; Guitar Gear.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: pacAir</title>
		<link>http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-55970</link>
		<dc:creator>pacAir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/#comment-55970</guid>
		<description>I think this is the best description of this guitar I have seen and it mirrors my own experience.  I originally was not interested in it and wasn&#039;t even in the market for a Les Paul.  When Musician&#039;s Friend put this model up as a &quot;Stupid Deal&quot; early in 2008 for a ridiculously low 24hr clearance price I couldn&#039;t resist.  I got mine for less than a current Les Paul Studio would have cost me!

Unlike the now-classic &quot;Ugly LP Zebrawood at Sweetwater.com&quot; or the standard Gibson promotional photos, my guitar turned out to have a grain pattern that was not ugly but also not tight and uniform.  It was reasonably-straight medium grain without any eye-catching definitive grain aberrations or color changes.  It probably falls in the upper middle of the &quot;zebrawood attractiveness scale&quot;.

I have yet to take the guitar out and play it in public (most of my friends don&#039;t even know I bought it!).  Before it gets unveiled I want to address a few things.  I have a TonePros nickle bridge/tailpiece set I want to install, oil the fingerboard, do a complete set-up and install new strings.  I also want to take &quot;000&quot; steel wool to the rough areas of the body finish (i.e. inside the cutaway) to make the guitar surface more uniform in feel.

I am in a quandry about the last touch I have been contemplating... installing the Antique-color pickguard that the guitar came with.  I personally like to have a pickguard on my LP guitars and I prefer the look of an LP that way.  However, this guitar does have a certain beauty about it and covering up part of that zebra-grain that makes it so unique feels a bit sacrilegious!  I also want to check on the availability of a replacement in this color if I did use the original and wanted to replace it later.

I am torn between getting to work on it and making it a player or leaving it in its&#039; pristine factory condition in case I change my mind later.  I don&#039;t normally fret over things like this but I have never had a guitar with a finish that makes me second-guess some of my own acquired tastes!  It isn&#039;t a love/hate sort of thing, I just feel like I need to do right by the guitar because it IS special.

Am I nuts?  Probably!  This guitar invokes a different vibe that makes me consider things I normally just blast past on a more standard instrument.  I don&#039;t feel that I am in love with the instrument any more than other favorite guitars but I certainly have a higher regard and respect for it that is different than I have for all the other guitars I own. 

Perhaps part of this is related to that chunk of Zebrawood... from what I have read this wood is difficult to locate, harvest, saw and transport and is considered an endangered species of sorts and this is why it is relatively hard to get and expensive.  It usually only used for decorative trim and is difficult to work because of its density (it is classified as an exotic hardwood) and the unusual bad smell it exudes when cut or sanded!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the best description of this guitar I have seen and it mirrors my own experience.  I originally was not interested in it and wasn&#8217;t even in the market for a Les Paul.  When Musician&#8217;s Friend put this model up as a &#8220;Stupid Deal&#8221; early in 2008 for a ridiculously low 24hr clearance price I couldn&#8217;t resist.  I got mine for less than a current Les Paul Studio would have cost me!</p>
<p>Unlike the now-classic &#8220;Ugly LP Zebrawood at Sweetwater.com&#8221; or the standard Gibson promotional photos, my guitar turned out to have a grain pattern that was not ugly but also not tight and uniform.  It was reasonably-straight medium grain without any eye-catching definitive grain aberrations or color changes.  It probably falls in the upper middle of the &#8220;zebrawood attractiveness scale&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have yet to take the guitar out and play it in public (most of my friends don&#8217;t even know I bought it!).  Before it gets unveiled I want to address a few things.  I have a TonePros nickle bridge/tailpiece set I want to install, oil the fingerboard, do a complete set-up and install new strings.  I also want to take &#8220;000&#8243; steel wool to the rough areas of the body finish (i.e. inside the cutaway) to make the guitar surface more uniform in feel.</p>
<p>I am in a quandry about the last touch I have been contemplating&#8230; installing the Antique-color pickguard that the guitar came with.  I personally like to have a pickguard on my LP guitars and I prefer the look of an LP that way.  However, this guitar does have a certain beauty about it and covering up part of that zebra-grain that makes it so unique feels a bit sacrilegious!  I also want to check on the availability of a replacement in this color if I did use the original and wanted to replace it later.</p>
<p>I am torn between getting to work on it and making it a player or leaving it in its&#8217; pristine factory condition in case I change my mind later.  I don&#8217;t normally fret over things like this but I have never had a guitar with a finish that makes me second-guess some of my own acquired tastes!  It isn&#8217;t a love/hate sort of thing, I just feel like I need to do right by the guitar because it IS special.</p>
<p>Am I nuts?  Probably!  This guitar invokes a different vibe that makes me consider things I normally just blast past on a more standard instrument.  I don&#8217;t feel that I am in love with the instrument any more than other favorite guitars but I certainly have a higher regard and respect for it that is different than I have for all the other guitars I own. </p>
<p>Perhaps part of this is related to that chunk of Zebrawood&#8230; from what I have read this wood is difficult to locate, harvest, saw and transport and is considered an endangered species of sorts and this is why it is relatively hard to get and expensive.  It usually only used for decorative trim and is difficult to work because of its density (it is classified as an exotic hardwood) and the unusual bad smell it exudes when cut or sanded!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LLLPPP</title>
		<link>http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-45126</link>
		<dc:creator>LLLPPP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/#comment-45126</guid>
		<description>After Goran&#039;s review I had to go and get one of these.  There are a bunch of sellers out there, each one reminding us that only 400 were made.  Then how come they are so common -- all over ebay and the internet?  Why aren&#039;t people grabbing up and keeping these?

Maybe I have an answer.  This guitar, appearance-wise, is a Les Paul in name only.  Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing, unless you own one you will never know.  Guess what?  I&#039;m glad I own one.

When I first opened the case I was greeted by the sight of the zebrawood live and in person.  I had never seen zebrawood live, and the appearance of the wood was overwhelming.  The wood is not subtle, it grabs your attention.  I think this is one reason  why this LP seems to be not in great demand.  This LP cannot be a guitarist&#039;s only LP, it has to be a second or a spare.  The wood grain is just too unconventional.  If you own only one LP, you want a more traditional one.  You don&#039;t want a wild one.

The zebrawood has a very porous texture, and the satin finishing process did nothing to smooth it out.  If Gibson had filled the pores and given it a gloss finish, I think the zebrawood would look absolutely awesome.  But that would have added substantially to the labor and the cost.  It would probably then be in the custom shop price range and I would not be holding one in my hand.

I will not go into tonal description, as it has been covered.  The workmanship on mine is first-rate, and the weight is light, though I never actually weighed it.  But it is a light LP.  The fingerboard needed oiling right away, and once oiled the rosewood came alive with grain patterns.  The pearloid inlays are not the greenish ones used on older LP Classics, but amberish.  All the trims, except the pickup selector switch tip, match nicely.  The switch tip is just too brownish for my taste.

Plug it in, close your eyes, and you are playing a LP.  No doubt about it.  The tone, the sustain, the action, the feel -- it is all Gibson Les Paul. Once all the crud is off the frets, once the fingerboard is broken in, this guitar will play like a gem.

But the zebrawood&#039;s stripes will always be there, to remind the owner that this is not a conventional LP.  The wood will always grab your attention, and anyone else&#039;s attention who happens to be looking at it.  Some will say the grain patterns are fabulous, some will say they are ugly.  The zebrawood demands your opinion -- you cannot ignore the wood.

And this is why I think even though only 400 were made, they are still available.  People cannot decide whether the wood is awesome or unsightly.  And very few people will spend this kind of money to get a controversial Les Paul.

As for myself, I am waiting for the tan part of the zebrawood to darken in color like they say it will.  I have seen pictures of aged zebrawood and they look very attractive.  Through handling and playing the pores will smooth out, the overall appearance will be less satin and more glossy.  Because to be honest, the sight of the zebrawood is still too loud for my taste.  But I ain&#039;t letting this baby go.  We are going to grow old together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Goran&#8217;s review I had to go and get one of these.  There are a bunch of sellers out there, each one reminding us that only 400 were made.  Then how come they are so common &#8212; all over ebay and the internet?  Why aren&#8217;t people grabbing up and keeping these?</p>
<p>Maybe I have an answer.  This guitar, appearance-wise, is a Les Paul in name only.  Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing, unless you own one you will never know.  Guess what?  I&#8217;m glad I own one.</p>
<p>When I first opened the case I was greeted by the sight of the zebrawood live and in person.  I had never seen zebrawood live, and the appearance of the wood was overwhelming.  The wood is not subtle, it grabs your attention.  I think this is one reason  why this LP seems to be not in great demand.  This LP cannot be a guitarist&#8217;s only LP, it has to be a second or a spare.  The wood grain is just too unconventional.  If you own only one LP, you want a more traditional one.  You don&#8217;t want a wild one.</p>
<p>The zebrawood has a very porous texture, and the satin finishing process did nothing to smooth it out.  If Gibson had filled the pores and given it a gloss finish, I think the zebrawood would look absolutely awesome.  But that would have added substantially to the labor and the cost.  It would probably then be in the custom shop price range and I would not be holding one in my hand.</p>
<p>I will not go into tonal description, as it has been covered.  The workmanship on mine is first-rate, and the weight is light, though I never actually weighed it.  But it is a light LP.  The fingerboard needed oiling right away, and once oiled the rosewood came alive with grain patterns.  The pearloid inlays are not the greenish ones used on older LP Classics, but amberish.  All the trims, except the pickup selector switch tip, match nicely.  The switch tip is just too brownish for my taste.</p>
<p>Plug it in, close your eyes, and you are playing a LP.  No doubt about it.  The tone, the sustain, the action, the feel &#8212; it is all Gibson Les Paul. Once all the crud is off the frets, once the fingerboard is broken in, this guitar will play like a gem.</p>
<p>But the zebrawood&#8217;s stripes will always be there, to remind the owner that this is not a conventional LP.  The wood will always grab your attention, and anyone else&#8217;s attention who happens to be looking at it.  Some will say the grain patterns are fabulous, some will say they are ugly.  The zebrawood demands your opinion &#8212; you cannot ignore the wood.</p>
<p>And this is why I think even though only 400 were made, they are still available.  People cannot decide whether the wood is awesome or unsightly.  And very few people will spend this kind of money to get a controversial Les Paul.</p>
<p>As for myself, I am waiting for the tan part of the zebrawood to darken in color like they say it will.  I have seen pictures of aged zebrawood and they look very attractive.  Through handling and playing the pores will smooth out, the overall appearance will be less satin and more glossy.  Because to be honest, the sight of the zebrawood is still too loud for my taste.  But I ain&#8217;t letting this baby go.  We are going to grow old together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goran</title>
		<link>http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-18911</link>
		<dc:creator>Goran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/#comment-18911</guid>
		<description>Well, I have promised this review and I took some time to really test the guitar all the way. I will skip the standard Les Paul Classic specs, except to mention it&#039;s the slim taper neck, which I like much better than the traditional &quot;baseball bat&quot; of the &#039;50s (I spend a lot of time on a shredder Ibanez). 
This LP is a brilliant Gibson all the way (even in spite of some traditional Gibson hickups), but you might have to do some adjustments before playing. I had to tighten a few screws, the socket was not tightened well, which is a pretty embarrassing kind of sloppiness for a company like Gibson. However, once I went over details like that, the guitar became what I expected: a true Les Paul with a twist. 
Zebrawood is sonically similar to maple, but &quot;warmer,&quot; in that it produces more lower-mids (and a touch more upper highs) without being muddy. That, and slightly hotter Pro burstbuckers result in a Les Paul that sounds warmer and stronger than its traditional ancestors/counterparts. The middle position has the famed Les Paul bell-like quality, the bridge pickup is sharp and tight, the neck gives you that liquid, warm tone, all of it with so much sustain that I actually have to adapt my playing to reduce it, here &amp; there. The stock Gibson strings sound old after about a week of my regimen of about 3 hours a day; anyone should replace them almost immediately. 
Now, I bought this guitar to keep it in the original shape as much as possible, while playing it actively; if I were not concerned with the original parts, I&#039;d replace the tuning machines immediately. While the stability is OK, getting the strings to the right pitch without sudden jumps and clicks can be painful - again, a standard issue with Gibson.
The look is a bit better what you see in the picture above, in that Gibson paid extra attention to visual details, and pearloid is actually slightly shaded toward cream/yellow, to better mach the zebrawood tones. 
Overall: even if you are a traditionalist who can&#039;t bear the blasphemy of the zebrawood look on an LP, this baby takes the LP sounds to some very good places they have never been before, yet retaining its unmistakable Les Paul character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have promised this review and I took some time to really test the guitar all the way. I will skip the standard Les Paul Classic specs, except to mention it&#8217;s the slim taper neck, which I like much better than the traditional &#8220;baseball bat&#8221; of the &#8217;50s (I spend a lot of time on a shredder Ibanez).<br />
This LP is a brilliant Gibson all the way (even in spite of some traditional Gibson hickups), but you might have to do some adjustments before playing. I had to tighten a few screws, the socket was not tightened well, which is a pretty embarrassing kind of sloppiness for a company like Gibson. However, once I went over details like that, the guitar became what I expected: a true Les Paul with a twist.<br />
Zebrawood is sonically similar to maple, but &#8220;warmer,&#8221; in that it produces more lower-mids (and a touch more upper highs) without being muddy. That, and slightly hotter Pro burstbuckers result in a Les Paul that sounds warmer and stronger than its traditional ancestors/counterparts. The middle position has the famed Les Paul bell-like quality, the bridge pickup is sharp and tight, the neck gives you that liquid, warm tone, all of it with so much sustain that I actually have to adapt my playing to reduce it, here &amp; there. The stock Gibson strings sound old after about a week of my regimen of about 3 hours a day; anyone should replace them almost immediately.<br />
Now, I bought this guitar to keep it in the original shape as much as possible, while playing it actively; if I were not concerned with the original parts, I&#8217;d replace the tuning machines immediately. While the stability is OK, getting the strings to the right pitch without sudden jumps and clicks can be painful &#8211; again, a standard issue with Gibson.<br />
The look is a bit better what you see in the picture above, in that Gibson paid extra attention to visual details, and pearloid is actually slightly shaded toward cream/yellow, to better mach the zebrawood tones.<br />
Overall: even if you are a traditionalist who can&#8217;t bear the blasphemy of the zebrawood look on an LP, this baby takes the LP sounds to some very good places they have never been before, yet retaining its unmistakable Les Paul character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-16179</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/#comment-16179</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on your soon-to-be new Les Paul, Goran––be sure to let us know how it turns out... I know my readers will be interested to hear what you think about your new instrument..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on your soon-to-be new Les Paul, Goran––be sure to let us know how it turns out&#8230; I know my readers will be interested to hear what you think about your new instrument..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goran</title>
		<link>http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-16175</link>
		<dc:creator>Goran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/#comment-16175</guid>
		<description>I actually had $2K lying around &amp; mine is coming in a couple of days. I&#039;m curious whether Z-wood will affect the sound noticeably, and will add a line to that effect when I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had $2K lying around &amp; mine is coming in a couple of days. I&#8217;m curious whether Z-wood will affect the sound noticeably, and will add a line to that effect when I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/comment-page-1/#comment-11345</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electric-guitar-review.com/2007/05/30/gibson-announces-guitar-of-the-week-19-les-paul-classic-antique-zebra-wood/#comment-11345</guid>
		<description>Now if only I had an extra $2000 sitting around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if only I had an extra $2000 sitting around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

