Reader Poll: Hmmm, PRS With A Bigsby… What’s Your Take?

Tue, Sep 30, 2008

Okay, so this is your chance to sound off, folks… for the last week or so I’ve been trying to wrap my brain around the basic aesthetic design of the new PRS Starla, but I just can’t seem to come up with a definitive opinion on what I think.

First off, hey––I love a Bigsby! But bolted onto a singlecut solidbody bearing the standard futuristic lines of a PRS, not to mention that spiky headstock, this thing just looks all wrong to me.

Of course, the newly introduced Starla could turn out to be the bee’s knees, and I’m certainly not going to make any judgment calls when it comes to playability or tone until I can get my freakin’ hands on one, but I thought it would be fun to hear what you all think of this latest model from the good folks at Paul Reed Smith.

I’m not sure what it is about PRS that seems to bring both fanatic proponents and detractors out of the woodwork, but the comments on this blog get predictably strange whenever I mention one of their guitars.

So here goes… whatcha’ think?

Posted Under: Featured, Guitars, Music, PRS, Rare Finds

19 Comments For This Post

  1. Mike Farley Says:

    Like you, I just find it wrong. But then I worry about PRS guitars with any form of trem - they only seem right to me with nice little wrapover stoptails… Now the Mira - that’s more like it!

  2. Gregor Says:

    I think Bigsby must have having a big market push. Carvin recently announced their guitars’ availability with Bigby trems too: http://www.carvinguitars.com/blogs/blogs/?p=54&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1

  3. Brian Says:

    I think it’s gorgeous, but I am a huge fan of kitschy oversized pickguards like that. The more crap you can stuff on the body, the better, I say!

  4. Sans Direction Says:

    It’s an abomination!

  5. Matt Says:

    looks like it’s trying to copy/compete with the Gretsch electromatic Pro Jet thing.

    not really a fan.

  6. Stratoblogster Says:

    There are probably more appropriate trems to put in a smaller solidbody.

    What I can’t figure out is why PRS doesn’t use a roller saddle bridge with Bigsby equipped guitars.

    The PRS SCJ-Thinline limited edition they’re promoting these days looks great with a Bigsby but is sorely in need of roller saddles!

  7. Gearhund Says:

    Why not? Why should PRS just keep making the same guitar over and over? This will give them a piece of Gretsch’s market. Besides, anyone who hasn’t played a guitar with Tron’s and a Bigsby really hasn’t lived yet. It’s Rock-n-Roll Baby!

  8. Tom L Says:

    They gave this guitar the perfect name: Starla. That is to say, “cheap whore.”

    Pickups and Bigsby look like they were robbed from a Gretsch. TOM bridge and single cut body style from Gibson
    Pickguard actually looks like it came from a 70s Gibson — Marauder or S-1. Never a good idea to be taking style cues from those guitars…

    Marry all of that with a nasty brown finish and that distinct PRS headstock, and you now have the ugliest guitar in the PRS line and possibly the ugliest new guitar of 2008 — even worse than the Gibson reverse Explorer.

    Mike is right…they got it right with the Mira, but “Starla” totally missed the mark. Wonder if it come in a pink vinyl case?

  9. mark Says:

    they nearly pull it of, but it looks a little daft. nah…

  10. Mark Kardwell Says:

    I’m in the “why not?” camp. Those pick-ups and that trem sound great together, and PRS are more of a reliable stamp for build quality than Gretsch themselves. So yeah, if you want that sound, again, “why not?”

  11. Mark Kardwell Says:

    Oh aye. But the guitar in itself? Ugly as sin.

  12. Don Says:

    Eastwood does it better.

  13. John Says:

    I agree with Stratoblogster on the SC-J Thinline with a Bigsby; it looks pretty good on that guitar, maybe because the SC-J is HUGE! On the Starla things just look crowded. I’d get tired if it’s getting in the way of volume/tone knobs. Maybe it’ll work out ok with the controls when you play it but it sure doesn’t look that way from the pics. The Starla (w/o Bigsby) may grow on me over time, though; that’s what the Mira did. And +1 on Don’s comment.

  14. G L Wilson Says:

    I like it!

    It’s the first time I’ve seen a PRS that I actually like the look of.

  15. kana Says:

    putting a pig on lipstick (sic). PRS has the best trems in the industry. why do this?

  16. Tritone Says:

    I also think it’s the best-looking PRS yet (and this is coming from someone who already has two).

  17. muramasa Says:

    Gibson-like, Gretch-like, Strat-like…… who cares about traditional looks. I say try all sorts of crazy things, if the quality and tone are there I don’t care if it has “VIntage” features or “futuristic” curves. Lets have a free for all with guitar makers trying anything, thats the only way guitar making is going to progress!

  18. Paul Says:

    Vintage Guitar Magazine gave rave review; current edition. I bought one yesterday and I must say; never being a PRS guy- I’ve tried Custom 24, McCarty, Custom 22 in the past; this short scale monstrosity is nothing short of a MONSTER through my Dr. Z Prescription Rx Jr. Strength! Huge neck; huge tone with a jangle (Ric) at the end. Ugly for sure; but the tone is worth the ugliness.

  19. Jonathon Says:

    Kana said: “PRS has the best trems in the industry. why do this?”

    The Mira & Sarla have significantly thinner bodies than the rest of the PRS line (I’ve got a Mira, it’s a very skinny guitar, kind of like an SG) and apparently there just isn’t room normal trem…

    Going back to the original question, I think this one really needs more extrovert colours to work. A full-on retro-kitsch vibe with sparkly metallic colours and a pearloid or tortoiseshell pickguard are the way to go on this one I think!

    Still what the heck would I know, I bought a Lilac Mira and I don’t think anybody except me likes that colour :-)

    — Jonathon.

Leave a Reply